The Lottery and Its Critics
A lottery is a game of chance in which participants pay for a ticket that contains numbers and win prizes if the winning numbers are drawn. State lotteries are typically run independently, but many participate in consortium games that span multiple states and offer larger jackpots. The popularity of the lottery has led to its adoption in most countries, and its expansion into other forms such as keno and video poker. However, despite the wide acceptance of the lottery and its rapid growth, critics argue that it has a number of serious flaws. These include a potential to fuel compulsive gambling and its regressive effect on lower-income groups. The success of the lottery has also raised questions about the ability of government at all levels to manage an activity from which they profit.
In the short story “The Lottery,” Shirley Jackson depicts a small, unnamed American village that holds an annual lottery in June. The villagers are excited but anxious as they await the results of the drawing; Old Man Warner quotes an ancient proverb that says, “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.” During the event, people greeted each other and exchanged bits of gossip and news. Jackson uses this scene to show how human beings are deceitful and amoral.
The lottery is popular because it offers a dreamlike opportunity to become rich. Those who play often say they do so as a form of fun, or to fantasize about the good fortune that might come their way at a price of only a couple of dollars. But studies have shown that low-income people tend to be disproportionately likely to play, and that they spend a greater proportion of their incomes on tickets. Critics have argued that this is a disguised tax and is harmful to society.
During the immediate post-World War II period, when lotteries first gained in popularity, state governments were looking for ways to expand their social safety nets without resorting to especially onerous taxes on middle and working class citizens. The argument was that a new source of revenue—the lottery—could help alleviate these burdens by raising money that would otherwise be spent on other state programs.
Since then, lotteries have grown exponentially and continue to attract a significant share of the public’s attention. They have engendered intense debates about whether or not they are ethical and whether the profits should be used to further public policy goals. While state lotteries have broad public support, they have also developed extensive specific constituencies, including convenience store owners (lottery advertising is prominently displayed in these businesses); lottery suppliers (heavy contributions by suppliers to state political campaigns are regularly reported); teachers (in states where lottery revenues are earmarked for education); and state legislators (who quickly get accustomed to the extra cash). Because of their business model, lottery operators have incentives to maximize profits by persuading as many individuals as possible to spend their money on the game. This may have negative consequences for poor people and problem gamblers, but it is difficult to see how it can be avoided.